New Video!

July 9, 2015

Finally! We’re back to creating more videos for the museum’s YouTube channel!


The latest video was added last week. Its about rural doctors in the early 1800s. I hope you enjoy it!

Photo of video about 19th century doctors

Photo of video about 19th century doctors

Radio interview

August 15, 2011

Last week I had my first radio interview! It was for the Ohio Reading Radio Service, which is a special radio station that reads newspapers and magazines to blind people. I did 2 half hour segments for their “Insights” show. We talked about my educational background, the museum collection, and plans to make the exhibits more accessible to blind onsite visitors through audio clips and touchable objects. It was a lot of fun!

To hear the interview click here.

Physical vs. technological diagnosis

April 10, 2009

In modern medicine, physicians are greatly aided in diagnosis by new machines and technology. Undoubtedly these devices provide more accurate and detailed information than the old, low-tech methods, which usually leads to better treatment for the patient. However, some vestiges of the old methods are still in use and still provide valuable information for a doctor. These methods of physical diagnosis, such as using a stethoscope and taking your pulse or blood pressure, have remained cornerstones of a clinical examination.

Ancient Egyptians, Chinese, and Greeks all recognized the value of reading the pulse to diagnosis illnesses. Many cultures identified various qualities in the feeling of the pulse and correlated those to illnesses. As early as 2600 BC the Chinese recorded observations of the effect of excess salt in the body leading to a faster pulse. However it would be many years until the the circulation of the blood and the workings of the circulatory system were understood. In 1616, William Harvey’s experiments proved that the blood flowed in a circular fashion through the body and was pumped by the heart, not the arteries themselves.

Johannes Kepler (1571-1630), famous for his study of astronomy and mathematics, was also the first person who recorded counting the pulse by the minute. Previously, analyzing the pulse rate was a strictly qualitative method. Skilled physicians may have been able to identify high blood pressure and other illnesses using this method, but it was a precise art. Using a standard unit of measurement allowed physicians to compare data and create charts for normal and abnormal readings and their meanings. By the early 170os, counting the pulse by the minute had become common. As the century progressed, more attention was paid to the quantity of pulse, not the quality.

With the increased use of pulse data, physicians began to invent devices to read and record the pulse. The first of such machines was invented in 1555 by Joseph Struthus. He pioneered the idea of representing the pulse graphically, but lacked the technology for a sophisticated device. After 1616, with new understanding about the circulatory system, the importance of stress on the heart, and a rise in quantitative readings, doctors also became interested in measuring the pressure of the blood to diagnosis disease. Physicians had discovered that one could measure the pressure inside the artery by measuring the amount of outside pressure it took to stop the flow of blood. In the late 1700s and early 1800s many cumbersome devices were made that applied measured pressure to the artery in the wrist and recoded the pulse response on a rotating cylinder covered with smoked paper.

In 1896, Italian Scipione Riva-Rocci invented a simple instrument that obstructed the artery using an inflatable arm cuff. A vertical meter filled with mercury measured the amount of pressure in the cuff. The next year, two physicians used this devise to monitor eight surgical patients while they were under anesthesia. At the turn of the century, blood pressure measurement began to reach a significant level in the United States for the first time.

The last major discovery in the measurement of blood pressure came from a young Russian doctor serving a military hospital. Using a pressure cuff, Nicolai Sergeivich Korotkoff began using a stethoscope to listen to the pulse under the cuff and noticed several distinct sounds as the pressure was released. In 1905, after further study, he was able to identify the sounds of maximal and minimal pressure of the artery. In 1927, the United States Bureau of Standards recognized this method as the most accurate for the measurement of blood pressure and it became a routine procedure in medical examination.

As a side note, the evolution of methods to measure blood pressure also illustrates medicines inter connectivity with broader science and discovery. For example, the use of pulse in diagnosis was greatly aided by standardized time. Our understanding of blood circulation was increased in 1839 when physicists determined a law for the behavior of  liquids flowing in tubes. The modern blood pressure cuff was not possible until Charles Goodyear had invented vulcanized rubber in 1839 and John Dunlap had refined it to make a pneumatic tire in 1887.

The upcoming exhibit “Tools of the Trade: Medical Instrumentation” will address the evolution of a variety of medical tools and procedures.

19th century doctors in the U.S.

March 11, 2009

During the late 1800s, many advances in medical knowledge and technology resulted in dramatic changes to many areas of the profession. The two major advances were the acceptance of the germ theory of disease and the use of anesthesia during surgery. These two discoveries, in combination with continued research of the human body and the development of specialized tools, led to major transformations in our concepts of illness, methods of treatment, and hygienic practices at the turn of the 20th century.

Medical practice during most of the 19th century was carried out in private homes or occasionally in a private doctor’s office. During the Industrial Revolution, hospitals in large cities had a reputation for being dirty. Many people contracted diseases from staying in the hospital because doctors did not know how disease spread. Therefore, those that could afford it called a doctor to their homes. Doctors usually worked in a wide geographic area, and were expected to treat everything from toothaches to stomach aches, fevers, and sick livestock. As the century progressed, knowledge of specific parts of the body increased, specialized tools and procedures were developed, and gradually, doctors became specialized in broad areas of medicine.

In the 1800s, most doctors traveled by foot or horseback to patients’ homes. In this practice, a physician was limited in the number of tools and drugs he could use to those items that could fit in a hand-held case or saddlebags. It is understandable that the quality of care might be poor due to the combination of limited tools and the expectation of the doctor to treat a wide variety of aliments. Examinations and treatment were also done in a patient’s home.  Examinations could include general observation of the patient’s body, the use of a stethoscope to the chest, lungs, and digestive track, or the analysis of blood or urine. A popular treatment was bleeding. There were many ways to bleed a patient and it was often done repeatedly over a short period of time. A single blood-letting could consist of 12 ounces, which is about 6% of an adults total volume of blood. (See a video about bleed tools here.) Other principle treatments included specific diet instructions, rest, baths, massage, blistering specific areas of the body, sweating, enemas, purging through use of diuretics and emetics like ipecac, and prescriptions such as anti-inflammation creams or herbal pills.

blood-letting device

blood-letting device

Surgery could also be carried out in a patient’s home. Anesthesia was not widely used until the end of the century, so most surgeries were limited to surface areas of the body and a patient’s tolerance of pain. Early anesthesia consisted ether or chloroform, and carried some risk of asphyxiation. An additional risk in this type of surgical setting is infection. In the United States, anti-septic was not common until the turn of the century, so the risk of infection from any surgery was high.

Like today, 19th century doctors usually charged their patients per procedure. They may have charged more for emergency evening visits or charged less for the treatment of a child. One major difference from doctors of today is that 19th century doctors were not often paid with cash, but rather “in kind” with whatever produce, services, or goods were available to the patient. This was especially true for rural or frontier doctors.

Find out about 20th century doctors, dentists, and surgeons by clicking on the “Doctors and Dentists Offices” link under the Exhibits tab.